Amazon Dash: April Fools?

Apparently this is not an early April Fools Joke. Amazon has made shopping on their site even easier. One click checkout wasn't enough, now it's quite literally going to be just one push of the button away. Dash will be available only to Amazon Prime subscribers, furthering Amazon's push to get people to sign up for their service. Essentially, Dash is a system of buttons that will be attached to certain spots in your home, when you run out of or are close to running out of a certain product, you hit the corresponding button and Amazon will ship you more. Simple. And don't worry about hitting the button multiple times and having 200 laundry detergent bottles show up at your front door -- hitting the button more than once still results in just one order being processed. You also will have 30 minutes to cancel the order and a notification immediately pops up on your phone to confirm the order. 

Let's think about the upside to owning a product like this. If I need a refill of toothpaste or razors quickly, I might run to a CVS or grocery store. But if I see myself getting low a day or two before and am busy with work, I can hit the Dash button to preempt me running out. By the time I use my last razor, a refill pack will be sitting at my door. Easy? According to Amazon, they believe this convenience will work for lots of other products, everything from laundry detergent to Kraft macaroni and cheese. On Amazon's side, they will get you to buy more products off their site more often. For someone who normally would go to a store to buy these products, this will eliminate impulse purchases you make at the grocery story. Say you head out just to pick up more toilet paper and while heading down the aisle spot some chips, and then some soda and say "I'll just grab that while I'm here." When you don't even have to leave your house, this won't happen. But for those that were going to buy the products off of Amazon already, how much more of a convenience is this? I can already scan bar-codes of products using the Amazon app, and with a few clicks I'll have that product shipped. That's just it, the scan and the clicks. Dash eliminates that. Just as someone might wonder why there is a need for an Apple Watch when I can already do everything from the Iphone, why get a Dash button when I can already order products from my phone? It seems, technology is closer and closer to making it as easy as possible to do more than ever. Dash is a further move in this direction.

On the other side of the coin, there's obviously some negative aspects we should take a look at. The author of this Wired article brings up one point I want to elaborate more on. The information that these devices will provide to Amazon, giving them more opportunities to market specifically to you. As the author mentions, say you have been buying toilet paper every 2 months using Dash. Amazon would be able to tell if you are low on fiber content, they would then market certain dietary products specifically to you. We can expand this further, say you haven't been buying razors as often, they can speculate you've started to grow some facial hair and begin showing you ads pertaining to products dealing with facial hair hygiene. The bottom line is Amazon will gather more information about you and be able to use it to their advantage. There is also the button itself to think about, how that might look in certain parts of your house. I sure wouldn't want some Gatorade logo on my refrigerator. They must be out of sight from the visible eye, say in the pantry or behind the coffee maker. It also might be annoying if your child hits the button every day, forcing you to cancel orders over and over again. However, I'm a tech optimist, I think a niche product like this will probably be useful in some circumstances.

At the end of the day, to those of you that are skeptical about this product, I'm partially with you. It will be interesting to see if and how this catches on. However, with the introduction of 2 hour shipping by Amazon in NYC and now Dallas, this is ultimately where we are headed in the future. Making it as simple as humanly possible to order goods off their site is a goal for CEO Jeff Bezos and co. This is just another extension of that. Or it could just be another Amazon shot at free publicity, Happy April Fools Everyone.

The Sad State of Penn State Basketball:

As March Madness roles on, Penn State basketball fans watch on feeling a bit of a longing. Maybe longing isn't the right word. Frustration. When you fill out your bracket this year, there will be no Penn State team to root on. However, there will be seven other Big Ten schools in the tournament. Yet, sports fans are used to seeing the Nittany Lions near the top of the Big Ten leaderboard in almost every other sport. Let's quickly run through a few other Penn State Sports Team's…

-          Women’s volleyball won the NCAA National Title this year, their 6th title in just 8 years.

-          Men's wrestling had won 4 straight NCAA National titles before finishing 6^th in the nation this year.

-          Women’s field hockey has more Big Ten titles than any other school in the conference.

-          Women's basketball. The Lady Lions have reached the NCAA Tournament more than any other school in conference history. Quite the accomplishment.

-          Fencing teams have been either champions or runner up in 21 of 25 years.

I haven't even touched on some other well known sports and already, across the board, we see huge success for Penn State sports teams. Where do we not see any success? Men’s Basketball. Sadly, this year has been no different than most other years. Heck, this team wasn't even invited to the NIT. As a basketball fan and Penn State student, it’s frustrating. To see the other large state schools in the Big Ten make the NCAA tournament and win games, I wonder, why Penn State can’t garner that same success.

Let’s look at how Penn State fared in offense this year…

-          191^st in Points per Game: 66.9

-          125^th in Rebounds per Game: 35.3

-          328^th in Assists per Game: 9.9

-          258^th in Field Goal %: .420

Maybe the Defense was better?

-          156^th in Points Allowed: 66.2

-          198^th in Steals per Game: 6.1

These are poor numbers, but we can’t just glance at some rankings to explain the team’s failure. To compare, let’s look at Michigan, which finished a disappointing year by Michigan standards.

                                                                                                           Differential

-          240^th in Points Per Game: 64.7                       (PSU 191)       (-49)         

-          329^th in Rebounds per Game: 30.2                  (PSU 125)       (-204)       

-          231^st in Assists Per Game: 11.9                       (PSU 328)       (+97)        

-          224^th in Field Goal %: .426                             (PSU 258)       (+24)       

-          102^nd in Points Allowed: 64                            (PSU 156)       (+54)        

-          275^th in Steals per Game: 5.4                         (PSU 198)       (-77)         

What do these numbers tell us? Not much. Michigan actually had worse numbers in a few categories. Yet they still had 4 more Big Ten wins than Penn State. I was curious, because if you followed the season, you would have noticed that Penn State started the season 12-1. That’s right, 12 wins and 1 loss. The team finished the season on a 6-15 run, culminating with a meager 18-16 record. Next, I checked the Strength of Schedule (SOS) and Basketball Power Index (BPI). The BPI is a measure that takes into account multiple variables and comes up with a power ranking for each team. It’s an accurate measure for analysts to gauge just how good a basketball team really is. 100 is the best score you can have. To give some context, teams like Wisconsin and Duke are in the mid to low 90s. As I looked around, relative to other Big Ten teams Penn State wasn’t far off in opponents BPI. Meaning, Penn State played teams with an average BPI almost on par with other successful Big Ten teams. Let’s have a look.

-          Michigan State Average BPI: 66.7

-          Iowa Opponents Average BPI: 65.2

-          Penn State Opponents Average BPI: 62.4

Not that far off, but I realized this didn’t explain everything. Before Big Ten games start, teams play 13 non-conference games. Teams are able to schedule whatever games they want during this stretch, and many teams look to bolster experience and toughness by playing some solid opponents. I disaggregated the data and calculated the average opponents BPI for purely non-conference games. That’s when things became a littler clearer. Below is what I found.

Non-Conference Average Opponents BPI

-          Wisconsin                                61.63

-          Michigan St.                            54.96

-          Michigan                                 54.89

-          Rutgers                                    54.36

-          Iowa:                                       54.20

-          Maryland                                 53.72

-          Purdue                                     52.93

-          Indiana                                    51.08

-          Illinois                                     50.89

-          Northwestern                          49.49

-          Ohio State                               49.41

-          Nebraska                                 49.32

-          Penn State:                            47.53

By measure of opponents BPI, Penn State played the weakest non-conference schedule in the Big Ten… by far. The outlier is obviously Wisconsin, a true title contender, they looked to mesh with the best in the beginning of the season, a notable loss being to Duke. However the rest of the teams hover in the low 50s. Except for one… Penn State had far and away the weakest non-conference schedule. This season it showed, 12-1 against these low quality opponents. Once Big Ten play showed up, Penn State looked unready and unable to cope with this newfound talent, finishing up 5-16 in conference games. Smart coaches and smart fans understand, non-conference games is not a time to pad the coaches win sheet, it’s to get the team ready for conference games. Sure, let’s concede every team does schedule a few doozies to steamroll and boost confidence in the beginning of the season. But that is balanced out by tougher opponents as well. For instance, Iowa’s non-conference schedule included games against 6 teams that made the big dance (Texas, ND State, Hampton, UNC, Iowa State, and Northern Iowa). There’s a reason Iowa went dancing this year and Penn State didn't even come close.

Penn State finished 2^nd to last in the Big Ten, behind only Rutgers. Even Nebraska, and it’s hard to imagine how they recruit basketball talent out in cornhusker land, finished ahead of Penn State in the Big Ten this year. This is unacceptable. At a school with so much success in other athletics, this is not a standard the school should be setting. Yet here they are commending the head coach. Just last week Head Coach Pat Chambers received a two year contract extension, giving him until the 2018-2019 season to get things turned around. Beyond that, the AD has consistently talked up Chambers to the media (Link). If this is the bar that Penn State is setting for basketball, then it’s hard to see how the school will be anything more than the abysmal program that is known as Penn State basketball. For now, enjoy the emptiness of the BJC and the disappointment year after year. I’ll leave you with this clip, for this video is Penn State Basketball in a nutshell.  Please show me one other team that has their point guard inbound the basketball to break a press. Seriously, leave me a comment and let me know, I’d be curious to find out.